Skip banner and navigation tools.

 |  site map

Catalogue XRT results for GRB 160509A

Data were analysed using HEASOFT version 6.29

About these products.

Back to list of GRBs.

Summary Information

RA:20h 47m 00.71sLC breaks:2
Dec:+76° 06′ 28.8′′LC type:Oddball.
Err:1.5′′NH,intr.:2.65×1022 cm-2
Gal long:110.019RedshiftUnknown
Gal lat:19.840Γ2.0
| |

Jump to: Light curve | Spectra | Compare to other bursts.

If you use any of these data, please cite Evans et al. (2009), which describes how these products were created (see the usage policy for more information).

Light curve

Hide the light curve section.

This light curve comes from the light curve repository (if you use it, please cite Evans et al [2007, 2009]. Flares, marked by cross-hatched regions, are identified automatically, but may have been manually corrected. These are excluded from the fit. Any power-law breaks added to the fit must be required at the 4-σ level (according to an f-test) to be included in the best-fit. Details of all fits attempted are given below the plot. For more information see the light curve fitting documentation.

Fitted light curve of GRB 160509A

Fit Details

0629197Image of this fit
1224195Break required.

(2.55e-42 % probability of chance improvement)
Image of this fit
2185193Break required.

(7.11e-07 % probability of chance improvement).
This is the best fit.
Image of this fit
3184191Break significance <4-σ
(78.31 % probability of chance improvement)
Image of this fit
4178189Break significance <4-σ
(16.14 % probability of chance improvement)
Image of this fit

There are no flares ignored from this fit.

The best-fitting light curve has 2 breaks.

Click on the number of breaks in the table to the right to change which fit is plotted above and detailed below.

Currently showing the best fit.

α10.63 (+0.08, -0.09)
Tb,14.0 (+0.5, -0.5) × 104 s
α21.27 (+0.06, -0.06)
Tb,23.6 (+0.8, -0.6) × 105 s
α31.99 (+0.23, -0.17)

[Back to top]


Hide the spectrum section.

Spectra have been created for each power-law segment in the best fitting light curve (shown above). Times of flaring have not been removed, however this makes little difference to most spectra (see Fig 7/8c of Evans et al. 2009). For more information see the time-resolved spectroscopy documentation.

Jump to: phase1|phase2|phase3

phase1 spectrum (T0 + 9223372036854775807 to 40271 s)

Download spectral files for phase1 spectrum.

Plots to download

[Back to top]

phase2 spectrum (T0 + 9223372036854775807 to 358921 s)

Download spectral files for phase2 spectrum.

Plots to download

[Back to top]

phase3 spectrum (T0 + 9223372036854775807 to 20111 s)

Download spectral files for phase3 spectrum.

Plots to download

[Back to top]

Comparison with other bursts

Hide the comparison section.

Parameter distributions

The plots below show the probability density functions of the temporal and time-averaged spectral parameters for all GRBs, with the data for GRB 160509A shown on in colour. Click the images for larger versions.

For all plots, the solid vertical lines mark the values for this GRB, and the dashed lines the 1-σ uncertainties. For α and Tb, the colour changes for each phase. For the spectral parameters, the WT fits are shown in blue and the PC in red. These figures correspond to Figs. 5,6, 7a and 8a of Evans et al. (2009). See the PDF documentation for more information.

Temporal indicesBreak TimesNHSpectral indices
Comparison of decay indices Comparison of light curve break times Comparison of intrinsic column densities Comparison of spectral energy indices

Closure Relationships

The plots below show (α, β) scatter plots for each of the different types/phases of light curves (see light-curve types), since GRB 160509A is of type, "Oddball," which has no scatter plots of its own. GRB 160509A is shown in colour, with each light curve phase, or XRT mode marked by a different colour. α and β are the temporal and spectral energy power-law indices respectively. The shaded regions mark those allowed by the standard closure relationships. These figures correspond to Fig. 10 of Evans et al. (2009). See the closure relationship documentation for more information.

No break
Comparison of nobreak closures
One-break, steep first
Steep phase
One-break, steep first
Shallow phase
Comparison of One-break, steep first, steep phase closuresComparison of One-break, steep first, shallow phase closures
One-break, shallow first
Shallow phase
One-break, shallow first
Steep phase
Comparison of One-break, shallow first, shallow phase closuresComparison of One-break, shallow first, steep phase closures
Steep phase
Post jet-break
Comparison of Canonical, steep phase closuresComparison of Canonical, plateau phase closuresComparison of Canonical, normal phase closuresComparison of Canonical, post jet-break phase closures

[Back to top]